4.7 Article

Ground PM2.5 prediction using imputed MAIAC AOD with uncertainty quantification

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
Volume 274, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116574

Keywords

Aerosol optical depth (AOD); Fine particulate matter (PM2.5); AOD imputation; Uncertainty evaluation; Machine learning methods

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A missing data imputation model was developed for satellite-derived AOD and PM2.5 predictions, achieving superior performance, while considerable uncertainty was found in PM2.5 predictions associated with the imputed AOD values.
Satellite-derived aerosol optical depth (AOD) has been widely used to predict ground-level fine particulate matter (PM2.5) concentrations, although its utility can be limited due to missing values. Despite recent attempts to address this issue by imputing missing satellite AOD values, the uncertainty associated with the AOD imputation and its impacts on PM2.5 predictions have been understudied. To fill this gap, we developed a missing data imputation model for the AOD derived from the Multi-Angle Implementation of Atmospheric Correction (MAIAC) and PM2.5 prediction models using several machine learning methods. We also examined how the uncertainty associated with the imputed AOD and a choice of machine learning algorithm were propagated to PM2.5 predictions. The application of the proposed imputation model to the data from New York State in the U.S. achieved a superior performance than those related studies, with a cross-validated R-2 of 0.94 and a Root Mean Square Error of 0.017. We also found that there was considerable uncertainty in PM2.5 predictions associated with the use of imputed AOD values, although it was not as high as the uncertainty from the machine learning algorithms used in PM2.5 prediction models. We concluded that the quantification of uncertainties for both AOD imputation and its propagation to AOD-based PM2.5 prediction is necessary for accurate and reliable PM2.5 predictions. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available