4.6 Article

Cache-Aided General Linear Function Retrieval

Journal

ENTROPY
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/e23010025

Keywords

coded caching; linear function retrieval; uncoded cache placement

Funding

  1. European Research Council under the ERC [789190]
  2. NSF [2007108, 1817154, 1824558, 1910309]
  3. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  4. Division of Computing and Communication Foundations [2007108] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. European Research Council (ERC) [789190] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Coded caching, proposed by Maddah-Ali and Niesen, aims to reduce network traffic by storing content in users' local memories and transmitting coded multicast messages. This paper considers the linear function retrieval version of coded caching and designs a novel scheme that outperforms uncoded caching schemes.
Coded Caching, proposed by Maddah-Ali and Niesen (MAN), has the potential to reduce network traffic by pre-storing content in the users' local memories when the network is underutilized and transmitting coded multicast messages that simultaneously benefit many users at once during peak-hour times. This paper considers the linear function retrieval version of the original coded caching setting, where users are interested in retrieving a number of linear combinations of the data points stored at the server, as opposed to a single file. This extends the scope of the authors' past work that only considered the class of linear functions that operate element-wise over the files. On observing that the existing cache-aided scalar linear function retrieval scheme does not work in the proposed setting, this paper designs a novel coded caching scheme that outperforms uncoded caching schemes that either use unicast transmissions or let each user recover all files in the library.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available