4.7 Article

Multiperiod work and heat integration

Journal

ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT
Volume 227, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113587

Keywords

Optimization; Work and heat integration; Multiperiod work and heat exchange networks; Meta-heuristics; Process synthesis

Funding

  1. Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel - CAPES (Brazil) [88887.360812/2019-00]
  2. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development - CNPq (Brazil) [305055/2017-8, 311807/2018-6, 428650/2018-0]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a step-wise optimization-based framework for synthesizing multiperiod work and heat exchange networks, utilizing hybrid meta-heuristic methods to derive designs capable of operating under multiple known scenarios. It addresses critical conditions in work integration and presents solutions with lower costs and reduced overdesign issues in two cases.
The synthesis of multiperiod heat exchanger networks (HEN) is a well-studied topic in heat integration. Several methods for identifying heat exchanger network designs that are able to feasibly operate under multiple conditions have been presented. Multiperiod models are certainly a notable form of achieving such resilient designs. In work and heat integration, however, solutions presented so far are for nominal conditions only. This work presents a step-wise optimization-based multiperiod work and heat exchange network synthesis framework. Hybrid meta-heuristic methods are used in the optimization steps. The methodology is able to obtain work and heat exchanger networks (WHENs) that are able to operate under multiple known scenarios. A set of critical conditions for stream properties in work integration is proposed. When these scenarios are modeled as finite operating periods (which are here referred to as non-nominal periods), a WHEN which can feasibly operate under nominal and critical conditions can be obtained. An example is tackled in two cases: the first, with one nominal and six critical, non-nominal periods; the second with two nominal and twelve non-nominal periods. Note that with that number of periods, the problem is considerably more complex than in multiperiod HEN synthesis (which usually comprises three or four periods). Solutions obtained with the present method are compared to those obtaining by simply merging single-period solutions obtained for each period individually. Capital investments are 30.2% and 58.2% lower in Cases 1 and 2 than in straightforwardly merged solutions. The capacity utilization parameters also demonstrate that the overdesign issue is notably reduced in these solutions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available