4.7 Article

Comparative investigation on the supercritical carbon dioxide power cycle for waste heat recovery of gas turbine

Journal

ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT
Volume 228, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113670

Keywords

Waste heat recovery; Supercritical carbon dioxide power cycle; Single-objective optimization; Multi-objective optimization; Comparative investigation; Heat exchanger configuration

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper conducts a comparative investigation on the supercritical carbon dioxide power cycle for waste heat recovery of gas turbine, selecting four categories and six cycles to represent typical layouts. The turbine is found to dominate the investment cost of the system, suggesting the use of dual heated cascade cycle-II or partial heating cycle to improve system efficiency.
In this paper, a comparative investigation on the supercritical carbon dioxide power cycle for waste heat recovery of gas turbine is carried out. Four categories and six cycles are chosen to represent typical layout of supercritical carbon dioxide power cycle based on thorough literature reviews. The selected cycles are optimized and analyzed based on the results of single- and multi-objective optimization from the perspective of system efficiency, economic cost and configuration complexity. According to the exergy destruction analysis, several guidelines about the heat exchangers are proposed to enhance the thermal efficiency of gas turbine waste heat recovery system, including the avoiding of preheating, the utilization of partial heating layout, the employment of segmentation method and modified logarithmic mean temperature difference, the increase in the number of gas heater. The results indicate that turbine dominates the investment cost of power cycle. In conclusion, dual heated cascade cycle-II should be employed to pursue the maximized system efficiency. Otherwise, partial heating cycle is recommended due to its balanced overall performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available