4.7 Article

Cradle to Gate assessment of material related embodied carbon: A design stage stratagem for mid-rise housing in Sri Lanka

Journal

ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
Volume 230, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110542

Keywords

Embodied carbon; Cradle-to-Gate assessment; Materiality; Critical building component

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research focused on the implications of material selection in reducing carbon emissions at the design stage of buildings, particularly in mid-rise housing typologies in Sri Lanka.
Achieving low carbon buildings is seen as a key concept in order to reduce carbon emission and mitigate climate change. In contrast to operational emission, material related embodied carbon (EC) in the built environment plays a pivotal role, with the continuous consumption of high carbon emitting materials. This research relates to the 'Cradle-to-Gate' system boundary, while limiting its focus on building design stage decisions. A hybrid analysis approach was adopted a bottom-up process with steps encompassing mass analysis, EC calculation, highlighting carbon hotspots, and ultimately the identification of critical building components. As a case study, multi-storey housing was selected as a critical building typology, in Sri Lanka. The results reveal 'walls' as a carbon hotspot that needs to be explored in strategies for mitigation. Substantial EC savings were seen in the selection of fly ash blocks as an alternate material to clay brick or cement block. Changes to the configuration of walls, specifically, bonding patterns and non inclusion of a plaster layer, also showed savings. This paper, contributes to the understanding of material selection implications in the cradle-to-gate stage for the reduction of carbon emissions in mid-rise housing, in the context of Sri Lanka. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available