4.7 Article

Electrochemical Performance Enhancement of Nitrogen-Doped TiO2 for Lithium-Ion Batteries Investigated by a Film Electrode Model

Journal

ENERGY & FUELS
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages 2717-2726

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c03580

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Plan of Gansu Province [18JR3RA272, 20JR5RA274]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that nitrogen-doped TiO2 (TON) has a higher specific capacity and better initial Coulombic efficiency compared to amorphous TiO2 (TO) and anatase TiO2 (cTO), and this superior electrochemical performance is mainly attributed to the synergistic effects of bulk pseudocapacitor and battery characteristics.
Titanium dioxide (TiO2) is proposed as a promising anode material for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) due to its highly stable structure and slight side reaction at the electrode/electrolyte interface. The low specific capacity and slow Li-ion diffusion kinetics are the major bottlenecks for the actual application of TiO2. It is thus important to exploit viable pathways to enhance the electrochemical performance and understand the corresponding mechanisms. In this work, high-quality amorphous TiO2 (TO) and anatase TiO2 (cTO) film electrodes are employed to investigate the bulk electrochemical performance by minimizing the surface contribution. At the same time, nitrogen (N) doping is performed for further comparison. The results show that TO has a relatively lower specific capacity than cTO. However, N-doped TO (TON) presents a specific capacity more than 4 times higher than TO and 3 times higher than cTO. TON also exhibits a significantly improved initial Coulombic efficiency (ICE) and a relatively higher Li-ion diffusion coefficient. Our study shows that the superior electrochemical performance of TON is correlated to the synergistic effects of the bulk pseudocapacitor and battery characteristics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available