Journal
ENERGY
Volume 221, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.119919
Keywords
Permafrost hydrate; Numerical simulation; CO2/N-2 continuous injection; CH4 production; CO2 sequestration; CO2/N-2-CH4 replacement
Categories
Funding
- National Natural Science Foundation of China [21636009, 52004136]
- National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFC0307302, 2016YFC0304003]
- China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2020M670347]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
A new numerical simulator was developed for hydrate exploitation by CO2/N-2-CH4 replacement. CO2/N-2 injection combined with depressurization was used for gas production in actual hydrate reservoirs. The study investigated the influence of feed gas composition and injection pressure on CO2 sequestration and CH4 production, and compared the advantages of CO2/N-2 injection over traditional methods.
A new numerical simulator was developed from the widely used CH4 hydrate simulator TOUGH + HYDRATE to realize the simulation of hydrate exploitation by CO2/N-2-CH4 replacement. Focusing on actual hydrate reservoir, CO2/N-2 injection combined with depressurization in a practical continuous injection-production mode was applied for gas production. The influence of feed gas composition and injection pressure on CO2 sequestration and CH4 production was investigated. Moreover, we conducted a fair comparison and revealed the advantages of CO2/N-2 injection over two traditional methods in gas/water production performance. During gas injection, a continuous CO2/N-2 separation process under stratum environment was observed, and the whole gas replacement process can be roughly summarized as a continuous cycle of CH4 hydrate dissociation and CO2/N-2 hydrate formation. Increasing N-2 mole fraction from 30% to 50% significantly enhanced the CH4 production effi-ciency, while its increase from 50% to 100% mainly resulted in more N2 production and higher injection production ratio. Raising the injection pressure from 4.5 to 5 MPa improved CH4 recovery by 1.5 times, while increase from 5 to 7 MPa reduced CH4 recovery by 8.3%. A favorable CH4 recovery with relatively low cost can be achieved by finding an appropriate balance between CH4 release and CO2 sequestration. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available