4.7 Article

The effect of cathode channel blockages on the enhanced mass transfer and performance of PEMFC

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 222, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.119951

Keywords

PEM fuel Cell; Blockage; Mass transfer; Shape; Dimensionless; Length

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51776144, 51576147, 51706162]
  2. China?s 111 Project [B17034]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the influence of blockages on mass transfer and performance of PEMFC through 3D models, revealing that factors such as cross section shapes of blockages, ratios of blockage length to channel length and spacing length have a significant impact on the enhancement of mass transfer in PEMFC.
The design of flow field has a great influence on the mass transfer and performance of PEMFC (proton exchange membrane fuel cell) and lots of research works focus on this area. In this paper, 3D PEMFC models with a single straight channel are established to investigate the effect of blockages on mass transfer and performance. The influence of cross section shapes of blockages and dimensionless blockage length are discussed. Results show that cross section shapes of blockages have a great impact on the enhancement of mass transfer in PEMFC. The flow-guide part and the suppression part should occur together to enhanced the mass transfer with the flow-guide part upstream and the part suppression downstream. The ratio of the single blockage length to the channel length and the ratio of the blockage length to the spacing length also have a great impact on the enhancement of mass transfer in PEMFC. The PEMFC could obtain a superior performance as the ratio of the blockage length to the spacing length and the ratio of the total block length to the channel length are 0.5 and 30%, respectively. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available