4.7 Article

Optimization model of a thermal-solar-wind power planning considering economic and social benefits

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 222, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.119752

Keywords

Hybrid power planning; Equilibrium; Social benefits; Welfare; Optimization model

Funding

  1. National Natural Science foundation of China [71874053, 71373077,71904049]
  2. Ministry of Education Key Projects of Philosophy and Social Sciences Research [18JZD032]
  3. 111 Project [B18021]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that optimizing the configuration of hybrid power can balance economic and social benefits, improve energy utilization efficiency, and provide decision-making reference for policymakers.
At present, vigorously developing wind power, photovoltaic and other renewable energy has become one of the effective ways to deal with carbon dioxide emissions and energy supply and demand gap. Bringing renewable energy into the optimal configuration of power supply structure and reducing carbon emissions at the root will help promote the construction of clean, low-carbon, safe and efficient modern energy system. Therefore, starting from the theory of low-carbon economy, based on the traditional power planning model, this paper considers various uncertainties, introduces social welfare theory, and proposes the optimization scheme of thermal-solar-wind power system. The model is then applied to Southern Xinjiang supporting power project to study the investment behavior of low-carbon power, and the optimal low-carbon power decision-making behavior considering social benefits based on welfare is obtained. The results show that the proposed optimal configuration scheme of hybrid power can achieve the equilibrium between economic and social benefits, improve energy utilization efficiency and provide decision-making reference for policy makers. (c) 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available