4.7 Article

Identifying drivers for the direct rebound when energy efficiency is unknown. The importance of substitution and scale effects

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 222, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.119879

Keywords

Energy efficiency; Heat pump; Household energy consumption; Rebound effect

Funding

  1. Research Council of Norway through the Renergi program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study demonstrates that cost reduction from energy efficiency initiatives may lead to behavioral changes undermining energy savings. An analysis of household heat pumps shows that electricity savings are entirely offset by changes in demand, but overall energy efficiency increases and total energy consumption decreases.
The cost reduction resulting from energy efficiency initiatives may induce behavioural changes, which may undermine the energy savings effort embedded in the initiative (referred to as rebound effects). We develop a novel empirical method for illustrating contributions to the direct rebound for cases where the energy efficiency of the equipment is unobservable. Our focus is on substitution and scale effects in cases where more than one type of equipment may be used to produce the same service. We apply the model on a random sample of 1111 households from the Norwegian Survey of Consumer Expenditure for the year 2009 to identify components of the energy savings and rebound effects of household heat pumps. The results show that the electricity savings are completely offset by the rebound effects due to changes in demand, including changes in the mix of energy goods consumed and increased service production. However, the overall energy efficiency has risen, and total energy consumption is reduced. (c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available