4.7 Article

A multi-stage co-gasification system of biomass and municipal solid waste (MSW) for high quality syngas production

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 221, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.119639

Keywords

Co-gasification; Switchgrass; Municipal solid waste; Aspen plus; Simulation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41702286]
  2. Innovation Fund of China National Petroleum Corporation [2018D-5007-0209]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation (Southwest Petroleum University) [PLN201724]
  4. Sichuan Science and Technology Program [17GJHZ0061, 18GJHZ0206]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study simulated air and air-steam co-gasification of switchgrass and municipal solid waste using Aspen Plus software, analyzing the effects of co-gasification and steam/feed ratios on gas composition and gasification performance. Results showed higher gasification efficiency and product yield under specific conditions, but some parameters exhibited a decrease in performance with increasing CGR and S/F ratios.
Air and air-steam co-gasification of switchgrass (SG) and municipal solid waste (MSW) was simulated using Aspen Plus software. The proposed model is composed of four main parts, i.e. dryer, pyrolyzer, tar combustor and char gasifier. To validate the model, the simulated results were compared with the experimental data in terms of gas composition. The effect of co-gasification ratio (CGR) and steam/feed ratio (S/F) on gas composition, the product yield and gasification performance was studied. Results showed that maximum lower heating values (LHV) of 5.11 MJ/Nm(3), H-2 content of 13.66 vol%, dry gas yield of 1.39 Nm(3)/kg, carbon conversion efficiency (CCE) of 48.9%, and cold gas efficiency (CGE) of 39.92% were obtained for air-steam gasification of MSW and SG at the temperature of 800 degrees C, CGR of 40% and S/F of 1.2. When S/F increased from 0.8 to 1.2, the tar yield slightly decreased from 16.08 to 15.41 g/Nm(3). With increasing CGR from 0% to 40%, CGE initially increased from 28.81% to 29.25% and then decreased to 27.11%. Unlike CGE, CCE and dry gas yield continuously decreased from 42.97% to 39.28% and 1.22 Nm(3)/kg to 1.16 Nm(3)/kg with increasing CGR from 0% to 40%, respectively. (c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available