4.5 Article

Sweet Drinks as Fuels for an Alkaline Fuel Cell with Nonprecious Catalysts

Journal

ENERGIES
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en14010206

Keywords

carbonated soft drinks; juice drinks; alkaline fuel cell; power density

Categories

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFA0205102]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A study has constructed an alkaline fuel cell that successfully uses different sweet drinks as fuel, with carbonated soft drinks showing the best performance, providing a promising energy source for low-power electronics.
Sugar has the potential to create enough energy to power mobile electronics. Various sugar-powered fuel cells have been reported, however, most of them used pure glucose as substrate and enzymes/noble metals as catalysts. In this work, an alkaline fuel cell with cheap catalysts were constructed, and different sweet drinks were used as fuels for power generation. The influence of different substrates on the electrochemical performance was characterized under the controlled conditions. Our experimental results showed that the fuel cell fueled with carbonated soft drinks had the best performance under the conditions of 99.95 g/L chemical oxygen demand and 3M KOH. The power densities of the fuel cell fueled with different substrates decreased in the order of Pepsi (33.41 W/m(2)) > Sprite (28.38 W/m(2)) > apple juice (20.63 W/m(2)) > Coca (16.31 W/m(2)) > pear juice (15.31 W/m(2)) > orange juice (12.75 W/m(2)), which was consistent with linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) analysis. This is the first report on alkaline fuel cell (AFC) performance using different sweet drinks as substrate. These values are more than 10 times higher than those of reported microbial fuel cells. Our findings demonstrated that sweet drinks fueled alkaline fuel cells can be a promising energy source for low-power electronics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available