4.5 Article

Assessment of the Synergy between Recycling and Thermal Treatments in Municipal Solid Waste Management in Europe

Journal

ENERGIES
Volume 13, Issue 23, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en13236412

Keywords

circular economy; incineration; municipal solid waste; recycling; thermal treatment; waste-to-energy

Categories

Funding

  1. ERA-MIN2 program (under the ERA-NET Cofund scheme on Raw Materials)
  2. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [157]
  3. Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research (MIUR) [157]
  4. Open access publishing program of Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In 2018, the production of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) in EU-28 reached 250.6 Mt, with the adoption of different management strategies, involving recycling (48 wt %), incineration and thermal valorization (29 wt %) and landfilling (23 wt %). This work was based on the analysis of the baseline situation of MSW management in EU-28 in 2018, considering its progress in 2008-2018, and discussed the possible improvement perspectives based on a framework involving incineration and recycling as the only possible alternatives, specifically evaluating the capability of already-existing incineration plants to fulfill the EU needs in the proposed framework. The results of the assessment showed two main crucial issues that could play a pivotal role in the achievement of Circular Economy action plan targets: the need to increase the recycling quotas for specific MSW fractions through the separate collection, and therefore the improvement of definite treatment process chains; the optimization of the recovery of secondary raw materials from incineration bottom ash, involving the recycling of ferrous and nonferrous metals and the mineral fraction. Both issues need to find an extensive application across all member states to decrease the actual differences in the adoption of sustainable MSW management options.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available