4.5 Review

Technical and Commercial Challenges of Proton-Exchange Membrane (PEM) Fuel Cells

Journal

ENERGIES
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en14010144

Keywords

fuel cell; optimization; efficiency; automotive industry; electric vehicles

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fuel cell applications offer advantages such as fast start-up, high efficiency, no toxic emissions, and modularity, but high technology costs hinder widespread commercialization. Future research should focus on robust geometry designs and material characterization to reduce costs, while public awareness and risk assessment are needed to address safety concerns.
This review critically evaluates the latest trends in fuel cell development for portable and stationary fuel cell applications and their integration into the automotive industry. Fast start-up, high efficiency, no toxic emissions into the atmosphere and good modularity are the key advantages of fuel cell applications. Despite the merits associated with fuel cells, the high cost of the technology remains a key factor impeding its widespread commercialization. Therefore, this review presents detailed information into the best operating conditions that yield maximum fuel cell performance. The paper recommends future research geared towards robust fuel cell geometry designs, as this determines the cell losses, and material characterization of the various cell components. When this is done properly, it will support a total reduction in the cost of the cell which in effect will reduce the total cost of the system. Despite the strides made by the fuel cell research community, there is a need for public sensitization as some people have reservations regarding the safety of the technology. This hurdle can be overcome if there is a well-documented risk assessment, which also needs to be considered in future research activities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available