4.8 Article

Human CST complex protects stalled replication forks by directly blocking MRE11 degradation of nascent-strand DNA

Journal

EMBO JOURNAL
Volume 40, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.15252/embj.2019103654

Keywords

CST complex; DNA degradation; genome stability; nascent strand; replication stress

Funding

  1. NIH [R01GM112864, R01CA234266]
  2. Academia Sinica
  3. Taiwan Ministry of Science Technology [MOST 108-2321-B-002-054]
  4. National Taiwan University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The CST complex protects stalled replication forks from degradation by the MRE11 nuclease by inhibiting MRE11 binding to reversed forks, thus preventing excessive nascent-strand degradation and preserving genome integrity under replication stress, particularly in BRCA2 deficient cells.
Degradation and collapse of stalled replication forks are main sources of genomic instability, yet the molecular mechanisms for protecting forks from degradation/collapse are not well understood. Here, we report that human CST (CTC1-STN1-TEN1) proteins, which form a single-stranded DNA-binding complex, localize at stalled forks and protect stalled forks from degradation by the MRE11 nuclease. CST deficiency increases MRE11 binding to stalled forks, leading to nascent-strand degradation at reversed forks and ssDNA accumulation. In addition, purified CST complex binds to 5' DNA overhangs and directly blocks MRE11 degradation in vitro, and the DNA-binding ability of CST is required for blocking MRE11-mediated nascent-strand degradation. Our results suggest that CST inhibits MRE11 binding to reversed forks, thus antagonizing excessive nascent-strand degradation. Finally, we uncover that CST complex inactivation exacerbates genome instability in BRCA2 deficient cells. Collectively, our findings identify the CST complex as an important fork protector that preserves genome integrity under replication perturbation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available