4.4 Article

Optimization of overhead transmission lines insulation and grounding costs with respect to backflashover rate

Journal

ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 103, Issue 3, Pages 1711-1723

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00202-020-01180-7

Keywords

Transmission line; Investment costs; Tower grounding; Insulation; Backflashover; Flashover; Reliability; Lightning; Power transmission economics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper explores the optimization of transmission insulation and grounding based on different BFR evaluation procedures, comparing the results of traditional and modern evaluation methods. The study reveals that the stochastic simulation method leads to lower costs compared to the IEEE and EPRI methods.
In this paper, the optimization of transmission insulation and grounding is performed considering two backflashover rate (BFR) evaluation procedures widely applied in the industry. The optimization approach is based on the Lagrange formulation introduced by Hileman in late sixties. This method used the old AIEE procedure to evaluate the BFR of transmission lines. Since then a number of BFR evaluation are available to determine BFR rates outperforming legacy procedures. Recently, the Hileman's optimization method was updated using the EPRI two-point method to evaluate the BFR. However, despite the step-by-step EPRI method being still widely used in industry, stochastic simulation with specialized programs is becoming standard. Thus, in this paper, the insulation and grounding optimization methodology is updated using more adequate and recent BFR evaluation procedures such as the IEEE Std. 1243-97 and the Monte Carlo EMTP-based methods. Technical and economic results were compared with the existing optimization approach based on the EPRI two-point method using the EPRI 345 kV transmission line as test system. Results show that IEEE and EPRI methods yield equivalent results. The stochastic-based method (MC-EMTP) is more optimistic showing total and marginal insulation and grounding costs below the IEEE/EPRI methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available