4.6 Review

Is laparoscopic liver resection safe for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma? A meta-analysis

Journal

EJSO
Volume 47, Issue 5, Pages 979-989

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.11.310

Keywords

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; Laparoscopic liver resection; Open liver resection; Meta-analysis

Funding

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2019SCUH]
  2. Science & Technology Support Project of Sichuan Province [2018JY0019]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Comparing laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and open liver resection (OLR) for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), LLR showed advantages in terms of blood transfusion, resection rate, length of stay, overall morbidities, and death due to tumor recurrence compared to OLR. However, LLR was associated with smaller tumor size, fewer major hepatectomies, lower lymph node dissection rate, and inferior 5-year overall survival.
Background: The use of laparoscopic liver resection for curative surgery of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is not well established. Herein, we perform a meta-analysis to compare the differences between laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and open liver resection (OLR) for ICC. Methods: Multiple electronic databases were searched and 8 relevant studies containing 552 patients treated by LLR and 2320 treated by OLR were identified. The fixed effects and a random-effects model were used to perform a meta-analysis. Results: Compared with OLR, LLR for ICC was associated with less blood transfusion (7.14% versus 17.11%; OR: 0.32; 95% CI 0.15 to 0.71; P < 0.05), higher R0 resection (85.63% versus 74.69%; OR: 1.48; 95% CI 1.13 to 1.95; P < 0.05), shorter length of stay (LOS) (SMD: -0.40; 95% CI -0.80 to 0.00; P = 0.05), less overall morbidities (20% versus 32.69%; OR: 0.50; 95% CI 0.33 to 0.78; P < 0.05), and less death due to tumor recurrence (22.39% versus 35.48%; OR: 0.50; 95% CI 0.29 to 0.86; P <0.05); but LLR was associated with smaller ICC, fewer major hepatectomies, less lymph node (LN) dissection rate, and inferior 5-year overall survival (OS) (P < 0.05). Duration of operation, blood loss, average LN retrieved, LN metastasis, major morbidities, mortality, tumor recurrence, 3-year OS and disease free survival (DFS), and 5-year DFS were comparable (P >0.05). Conclusion: LLR for ICC is in the initial phase of exploration. More evidence is necessary to validate LLR for ICC. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd, BASO similar to The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available