4.7 Article

Progress in the use of DNA barcodes in the identification and classification of medicinal plants

Journal

ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY
Volume 208, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111691

Keywords

DNA barcodes; Medicinal plants; Bar-HRM; Metabarcoding; Chloroplast genome

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31772260]
  2. Chongqing Study Abroad Innovation Project [cx2019052]
  3. National Training Program of Innovation and Entrepreneurship for Undergraduates [X202010635443]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Since 2008, DNA barcoding has been widely used in the identification and classification of medicinal plants, ensuring the safety and effectiveness of medicinal materials. Through continuous optimization and integration with other technologies, DNA barcoding has become increasingly powerful in providing genetic information.
DNA barcoding is an emerging molecular identification and classification technology that has been applied to medicinal plants since 2008. The application of this technique has greatly ensured the safety and effectiveness of medicinal materials. In this paper, we review the application of DNA barcoding and some related technologies over the past 10 years with respect to improving our knowledge of medicinal plant identification and authentication. From single locus-based DNA barcodes to combined markers to genome-scale levels, DNA barcodes contribute more and more genetic information. At the same time, other technologies, such as high-resolution melting (HRM), have been combined with DNA barcoding. With the development of next-generation sequencing (NGS), metabarcoding technology has also been shown to identify species in mixed samples successfully. As a widely used and effective tool, DNA barcoding will become more useful over time in the field of medicinal plants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available