4.5 Article

Divergent Controls on Stream Greenhouse Gas Concentrations Across a Land-Use Gradient

Journal

ECOSYSTEMS
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages 1299-1316

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10021-020-00584-7

Keywords

Carbon dioxide; Nitrous oxide; Methane; Streams; Greenhouse gas; Sediment

Categories

Funding

  1. NSF Macrosystems Biology [1442444]
  2. NH Water Resources Research Center
  3. New Hampshire Agricultural Experiment Station
  4. USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture (McIntire-Stennis) Project [1019522]
  5. StreamPULSE
  6. Division Of Environmental Biology
  7. Direct For Biological Sciences [1442444] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Inland waters, especially streams, are significant sources of greenhouse gases such as CO2, CH4, and N2O. This study found spatial and temporal variability in GHG concentrations in 20 streams in New England, USA, and identified unique predictor variables for each gas. Developing an understanding of the factors controlling GHG dynamics in streams can help assess and predict how fluvial ecosystems will respond to changes in climate and land use.
Inland waters can be significant sources of carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) to the atmosphere. However, considerable uncertainty remains in regional and global estimates of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from freshwater ecosystems, particularly streams. Controls on GHG production in streams, such as water chemistry and sediment characteristics, are also poorly understood. The main objective of this study was to quantify spatial and temporal variability in GHG concentrations in 20 streams across a landscape with considerable variation in land use and land cover in New England, USA. Stream water was consistently supersaturated in CO2, CH4, and N2O, suggesting that these small streams are sources of GHGs to the atmosphere in this landscape. Results show that concentrations of dissolved CO2, CH4 and N2O differed in their spatial and temporal patterns and in their relationship to stream chemistry. Both bivariate and multivariate analyses revealed a unique combination of predictor variables for each gas, suggesting variation in the landscape attributes and in-stream processes that control GHG concentrations. Although hydrologic conditions did not explain variation among sites, temporal patterns in GHG concentrations align with seasonal phenologies in flow and temperature. We developed a conceptual model based on these data that describes the spatial variability in GHG production from streams and that can elucidate the dominant controls on each gas. Developing an understanding of the factors controlling GHG dynamics in streams can help assess and predict how fluvial ecosystems will respond to changes in climate and land use and can be used to incorporate emissions from streams into regional and global GHG emission inventories.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available