4.7 Article

Green behavior, green self-image, and subjective well-being: Separating affective and cognitive relationships

Journal

ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS
Volume 179, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106854

Keywords

Subjective well-being; Life satisfaction; Pro-environmental behavior; Self-image; Mediator model; Affect

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study uses UK panel data and the mediator model of life satisfaction to show that the impact of pro-environmental behavior on life satisfaction is mainly mediated by affect, while the relationship between green self-image and life satisfaction is more influenced by cognition. This suggests that the warm glow of pro-social actions may contribute to the association between green behavior and life satisfaction, while green self-image is predominantly a cognitive-evaluative construct.
Green lifestyles - understood as encompassing both pro-environmental behaviors and green self-image - have been shown to be positively associated with subjective well-being, but the pertinent literature pays little attention to the difference between cognitive and affective well-being. Using UK panel data and drawing on the mediator model of life satisfaction, we show that the relationship between pro-environmental behavior and life satisfaction relies mostly on the affective channel, which mediates the behavior-satisfaction relationship. The often-found association between green behavior and life satisfaction seems thus to be driven by a positive contribution to affect, which the individual - in turn - uses as one element of her cognitive life evaluation. Green self-image, on the other hand, is directly related to life satisfaction and this relationship is not mediated strongly by affect. We interpret these findings with regard to the (affective) warm glow of acting pro-socially for green behavior, whereas green self-image is predominantly a cognitive-evaluative construct.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available