4.7 Article

Landscape-scale differences among cities alter common species' responses to urbanization

Journal

ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/eap.2253

Keywords

camera trap; mammal; multi-city survey; occupancy; species richness; urbanization; wildlife

Funding

  1. Prentice Foundation
  2. Grainger Foundation
  3. Davee Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that the impact of urbanization on urban species diversity is related to landscape differences among cities. For example, in some cities, when the proportion of green space within a city exceeded 20%, some mammals' responses to urbanization changed from negative to positive; when the average housing density of a city exceeded about 700 housing units/km(2), some mammals' responses to urbanization also changed.
Understanding how biodiversity responds to urbanization is challenging, due in part to the single-city focus of most urban ecological research. Here, we delineate continent-scale patterns in urban species assemblages by leveraging data from a multi-city camera trap survey and quantify how differences in greenspace availability and average housing density among 10 North American cities relate to the distribution of eight widespread North American mammals. To do so, we deployed camera traps at 569 sites across these ten cities between 18 June and 14 August. Most data came from 2017, though some cities contributed 2016 or 2018 data if it was available. We found that the magnitude and direction of most species' responses to urbanization within a city were associated with landscape-scale differences among cities. For example, eastern gray squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis), fox squirrel (Sciurus niger), and red fox (Vulpes vulpes) responses to urbanization changed from negative to positive once the proportion of green space within a city was >similar to 20%. Likewise, raccoon (Procyon lotor) and Virginia opossum (Didelphis virginiana) responses to urbanization changed from positive to negative once the average housing density of a city exceeded about 700 housing units/km(2). We also found that local species richness within cities consistently declined with urbanization in only the more densely developed cities (>similar to 700 housing units/km(2)). Given our results, it may therefore be possible to design cities to better support biodiversity and reduce the negative influence of urbanization on wildlife by, for example, increasing the amount of green space within a city. Additionally, it may be most important for densely populated cities to find innovative solutions to bolster wildlife resilience because they were the most likely to observe diversity losses of common urban species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available