4.7 Article

Dispersal-niche continuum index: a new quantitative metric for assessing the relative importance of dispersal versus niche processes in community assembly

Journal

ECOGRAPHY
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages 370-379

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ecog.05356

Keywords

assembly processes; determinism; dispersal; environmental filtering; niche processes; null models; PER-SIMPER; stochasticity

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91851117, 41871048, 41571058]
  2. Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research (STEP) Program [2019QZKK0503]
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences [QYZDB-SSW-DQC043]
  4. Chinese Academy of Sciences President's International Fellowship Initiative [2018PS0007]
  5. project FRESHABIT LIFE IP [LIFE14/IPE/FI/023]
  6. Air and Water Conservation Fund (National Geographic) [GEFC12-14]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Patterns in community composition are scale-dependent and difficult to distinguish. The proposed dispersal-niche continuum index (DNCI) helps quantify the relative strength of dispersal and niche processes in community assembly. DNCI suggested that dispersal was the dominant process in observational datasets, but varied across organismal groups and study contexts.
Patterns in community composition are scale-dependent and generally difficult to distinguish. Therefore, quantifying the main assembly processes in various systems and across different datasets has remained challenging. Building on the PER-SIMPER method, we propose a new metric, the dispersal-niche continuum index (DNCI), which estimates whether dispersal or niche processes dominate community assembly and facilitates the comparisons of processes among datasets. The DNCI was tested for robustness using simulations and applied to observational datasets comprising organismal groups with different trophic level and dispersal potential. Based on the robustness tests, the DNCI discriminated the respective contribution of niche and dispersal processes in pairwise comparisons of site groups with less than 40% and 30% differences in their taxa and site numbers, respectively. In the observational datasets, the DNCI suggested that dispersal rather than niche assembly was the dominant assembly process which, however, varied in intensity among organismal groups and study contexts, including spatial scale and ecosystem types. The proposed DNCI measures the relative strength of community assembly processes in a way that is simple, easily quantifiable and comparable across datasets. We discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the DNCI and provide perspectives for future research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available