4.5 Article

Methane transport and sources in an Arctic deep-water cold seep offshore NW Svalbard (Vestnesa Ridge, 79°N)

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsr.2020.103430

Keywords

Methane; Aqueous fluid advection; Pore water modelling; Microbial methanogenesis; Arctic cold seep

Categories

Funding

  1. Research Council of Norway through its Centres of Excellence funding scheme grant 287 [223259]
  2. project Petromaks2 NORCRUST - Norwegian Margin Fluid Systems and Methane-derived Authigenic carbonate Crusts [255150]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sampling and analysis in active methane seep sites in deep water have revealed important methane distribution patterns and source characteristics.
We investigate the uppermost 60 cm of sediment in active pockmarks of a deep-water methane seep site from Vestnesa Ridge offshore NW Svalbard. Using video guided core sampling with a remotely operated vehicle we collected push cores directly from bacterial mats within two active pockmarks, Lunde and Lomvi. Pore water analyses show very shallow sulphate methane transition zones and transport-reaction modelling suggests a considerable amount of dissolved methane passing through the sediment water interface due to upwards advection of an aqueous fluid not previously reported from Vestnesa Ridge. In addition, we show that the amount of methane that bypasses the benthic methane filter greatly increases with higher aqueous fluid advection rate. Recent changes in methane flux are evident from lipid biomarker, seep carbonate, and delta C-13-organic carbon profiles in both pockmarks. Hydrocarbons at this cold seep site are supplied both by deep thermogenic sources from below the gas hydrate stability zone but also to a significant degree by microbial methanogenesis which dominates the signature in our shallow sediment cores with delta C-13-CH4 values as low as -77 parts per thousand.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available