4.5 Review

Advances in generation of three-dimensional skin equivalents: pre-clinical studies to clinical therapies

Journal

CYTOTHERAPY
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 1-9

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2020.10.001

Keywords

skin anatomy and physiology; skin diseases; skin equivalents; 3D cell culture; tissue engineering; wound tissue regeneration

Funding

  1. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, Ministry of Science and Technology, Government of India [CSIR-IICT MLP0053]
  2. UGC-JRF/SRF [IICT/Pubs./2020/133]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article highlights the latest approaches in developing skin equivalents, different models for studying skin diseases and properties, as well as current therapeutic applications of skin substitutes.
The inability of two-dimensional cell culture systems to adequately map the structure and function of complex organs like skin necessitates the development of three-dimensional (3D) skin models. A diverse range of 3D skin equivalents have been developed over the last few decades for studying complex properties of skin as well as for drug discovery and clinical applications for skin regeneration in chronic wounds, such as diabetic foot ulcers, where the normal mechanism of wound healing is compromised. These 3D skin substitutes also serve as a suitable alternative to animal models in industrial applications and fundamental research. With the emergence of tissue engineering, new scaffolds and matrices have been integrated into 3D cell culture systems, along with gene therapy approaches, to increase the efficacy of transplanted cells in skin regeneration. This review summarizes recent approaches to the development of skin equivalents as well as different models for studying skin diseases and properties and current therapeutic applications of skin substitutes. (C) 2020 International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available