4.5 Review

Application of Machine Learning Techniques in Drug-target Interactions Prediction

Journal

CURRENT PHARMACEUTICAL DESIGN
Volume 27, Issue 17, Pages 2076-2087

Publisher

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/1381612826666201125105730

Keywords

Drug-target interactions prediction; drug discovery; machine learning; computational methods; supervised learning; semi-supervised learning; unsupervised learning

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [11601407]
  2. Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China [2018JM1037, 2019JQ-279]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The article discusses three categories of algorithms applying machine learning techniques in drug-target interactions and compares the advantages and limitations of each method. The three major problems in drug-target interactions prediction are highlighted.
Background: Drug-Target interactions are vital for drug design and drug repositioning. However, traditional lab experiments are both expensive and time-consuming. Various computational methods which applied machine learning techniques performed efficiently and effectively in the field. Results: The machine learning methods can be divided into three categories basically: Supervised methods, Semi-Supervised methods and Unsupervised methods. We reviewed recent representative methods applying machine learning techniques of each category in DTIs and summarized a brief list of databases frequently used in drug discovery. In addition, we compared the advantages and limitations of these methods in each category. Conclusion: Every prediction model has both strengths and weaknesses and should be adopted in proper ways. Three major problems in DTIs prediction including the lack of nonreactive drug-target pairs data sets, over optimistic results due to the biases and the exploiting of regression models on DTIs prediction should be seriously considered.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available