Molecular diagnostic methods for pneumonia: how can they be applied in practice?

Purpose of review Pneumonia represents a major burden in clinical practice. A rapid etiological diagnosis is critical for optimizing the antibiotic use. Owing to the variety of possible pathogens and the time needed for bacterial cultures or usual polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays, timely and precise diagnosis is a huge challenge. Several new rapid multiplex assays have been developed in the last decade to resolve these issues. This review aims to provide an overview of recent evidence on improvements and limitations of new rapid molecular assays for pneumonia. Recent findings Several rapid multiplex-PCR assays are commercially available for upper or lower respiratory tract samples, allowing detection of a wide range of respiratory viruses, bacteria, and, in some cases, of several antibiotic resistance genes. Clinical evaluations demonstrated their good correlation with gold-standard assays but their lack of exhaustiveness, especially for hospital-acquired pneumonia. Studies that evaluated their potential benefits on antibiotic use suffered from important weaknesses with conflicting and limited results. New molecular assays may enable improvements in patient management and antibiotic use. Available studies highlight several benefits and the strong interrelations needed between microbiologists and physicians for their implementation and interpretation according to the clinical and epidemiological context.

Automated summary

Recent studies have shown that rapid multiplex-PCR assays can detect a wide range of respiratory viruses, bacteria, and even antibiotic resistance genes in upper or lower respiratory tract samples. While they have good correlation with gold-standard assays in clinical evaluations, they lack exhaustiveness, especially for hospital-acquired pneumonia.