4.5 Article

Damage assessment of Bemisia tabaci and economic injury level on soybean

Journal

CROP PROTECTION
Volume 143, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cropro.2021.105542

Keywords

Control threshold; Glycine max; Integrated pest management; Whitefly; Yield reduction

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The whitefly Bemisia tabaci has a significant impact on soybean yield, with each additional insect reducing yield. Based on the experimental data, an economic injury level is proposed for controlling this pest.
The whitefly Bemisia tabaci is the second most widespread and economically important arthropod pest in the world, with frequent population outbreaks occurring in Brazil and increasing economic damage on soybean crops. High oviposition rate, short life cycle and uneven distribution along the plants' canopy favour the dissemination of B. tabaci within soybean crops and compromise the efficacy of control measures. The objective of this work was to quantify soybean yield reduction caused by B. tabaci damage and propose an economic injury level (EIL) for this pest in soybean crops. Experimental design was randomized blocks with four replicates. Soybean grain yield and its components (number of pods, number of grains and 1000-grain weight) were quantified in relation to different levels of B. tabaci infestation in two cropping seasons, obtained through insecticide sprays carried out at different growth stages of the soybean plants. The resulting data were submitted to variance analysis, mean separation test and regression analysis. We found that a population density of one whitefly trifoliate(-1) reduces from 0.88 to 1.79 grains plant(-1), 0.16 +/- 0.01 g plant(-1) or 31.24 +/- 4.21 kg ha(-1)of grain yield, and varies in response for pods plant(-1) and 1000-grains weight. Based on this information, we suggest an economic injury level of 1.465 +/- 0.195 B. tabaci trifoliate(-1), considering a control cost of US$ 20.00 ha(-1) and soybean crop value of US$ 400.00 tonne(-1).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available