4.6 Review

miRNA as promising theragnostic biomarkers for predicting radioresistance in cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY
Volume 157, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.103183

Keywords

Cancer; Radioresistance; miRNAs; Systematic review; Meta-analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that miRNAs are associated with radioresistance and radiosensitivity in cancer treatment, with miR-21 showing different effects in different cancers. The results suggest that miRNAs could be used as theragnostic biomarkers to predict and monitor clinical response to radiotherapy.
Radioresistance remains as an obstacle in cancer treatment. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the association between the expression of miRNAs and responses to radiotherapy and the prognosis of different tumors. In total, 77 miRNAs in 19 cancer types were studied, in which 24 miRNAs were upregulated and 58 miRNAs were downregulated in cancer patients. Five miRNAs were differentially expressed. Moreover, 75 miRNAs were found to be related to radioresistance, while 5 were observed to be related to radiosensitivity. The pooled HR and 95 % confidence interval for the combined studies was 1.135 (0.819-1.574; P-value = 0.4). The HR values of the subgroup analysis for miR-21 (HR = 2.344; 95 % CI: 1.927-2.850; P-value = 0.000), nasopharyngeal carcinoma (HR = 0.448; 95 % CI: 0.265-0.760; P = 0.003) and breast cancer (HR = 1.131; 95 % CI: 0.311-4.109; P = .85) were obtained. Our results highlighted that across the published literature, miRNAs can modulate tumor radioresistance or sensitivity by affecting radiation-related signaling pathways. It seems that miRNAs could be considered as a theragnostic biomarker to predict and monitor clinical response to radiotherapy. Thus, the prediction of radioresistance in malignant patients will improve radiotherapy outcomes and radiotherapeutic resistance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available