4.0 Article

Self-reported sleep bruxism among Finnish symphony orchestra musicians: Associations with perceived sleep-related problems and psychological stress

Journal

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/08869634.2020.1853310

Keywords

Musicians; bruxism; sleep-related problems; stress

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to investigate the association between self-reported sleep bruxism among musicians and sleep-related problems and/or psychological stress. Results showed moderate associations between sleep bruxism frequency and female gender, shorter sleep duration, longer sleep latency, sleep problems during concert season, daytime fatigue, restless legs, poor self-rated sleep quality, and greater stress experience. The variables that remained in the final model were sleep duration, gender, and stress.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate whether self-reported sleep bruxism among musicians is associated with sleep-related problems and/or psychological stress. Methods: Eight hundred-thirty-one Finnish orchestra musicians completed a questionnaire that covered, among others, indicators of sleep-related problems, possible sleep bruxism, and stress. Results: In total, 488 questionnaires were completed. The single variable ordinal logistic regression models revealed at least moderate associations between frequency of sleep bruxism and female gender, shorter sleep duration, longer sleep latency, problems in sleeping during concert season, feeling more often tired during the daytime, restless legs, a poor self-rated sleep quality, and more stress experience. The variables that remained in the final model were sleep duration, gender, and stress. Conclusion: Musicians who sleep 7 hours or less per night report more sleep bruxism, as compared to those who sleep 8 hours or more. Female gender and high-stress experience were associated with more sleep bruxism.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available