4.8 Review

Pathways towards high energy aqueous rechargeable batteries

Journal

COORDINATION CHEMISTRY REVIEWS
Volume 424, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2020.213521

Keywords

Aqueous battery; Alkaline metal; Ion intercalation; High-energy; Water-in-salt electrolyte

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51972067, 21606003, 51802044, 51801030, 61801314]
  2. Guangdong Natural Science Funds for Distinguished Young Scholar [2019B151502039]
  3. 111 project [D18023]
  4. Singapore MOE [2018-T2-1-010, 2017-T1-002-009]
  5. National Research Foundation of Singapore (NRF) Investigatorship [NRF2016NRF-NRFI001-22]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aqueous rechargeable metal batteries (ARMBs) represent one type of energy storage technology with high theoretical energy densities, low cost and better safety. Their practical applications are hindered by the narrow voltage window of the aqueous electrolytes, limited efficiency in the intercalation/deintercalation of the metal ions (especially for the multivalent ions) and dissolution/structural variation of the electrodes in aqueous electrolytes. Effective strategies have been developed to address the above issues and significantly advanced performance and mechanistic understanding of the aqueous system. In this review, we highlight the representative strategies in achieving high-energy ARMBs, i.e., aqueous rechargeable Li/Na/K/Zn/Mg/Al ion batteries. Strategies in optimizing the composition/structure of conventional anodes and cathodes, progress of water-in-salt electrolyte, and novel ion storage mechanisms other than the intercalation chemistry will be discussed. It is expected that this review can provide a comprehensive overview of the status of the ARMBs and enlighten more research work that tackle the unsolved bottleneck issues. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available