4.3 Article

Positive definiteness in coupled strain gradient elasticity

Journal

CONTINUUM MECHANICS AND THERMODYNAMICS
Volume 33, Issue 3, Pages 713-725

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00161-020-00949-2

Keywords

Strain gradient elasticity; Coupling fifth-rank tensor; Positive definiteness of the potential energy

Funding

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG) [AL 341/51-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study examines the linear theory of coupled gradient elasticity for hemitropic second gradient materials. By diagonalization and matrix representation, inequalities for positive definiteness are obtained, with results matching those in the literature under certain special conditions.
The linear theory of coupled gradient elasticity has been considered for hemitropic second gradient materials, specifically the positive definiteness of the strain and strain gradient energy density, which is assumed to be a quadratic form of the strain and of the second gradient of the displacement. The existence of the mixed, fifth-rank coupling term significantly complicates the problem. To obtain inequalities for the positive definiteness including the coupling term, a diagonalization in terms of block matrices is given, such that the potential energy density is obtained in an uncoupled quadratic form of a modified strain and the second gradient of displacement. Using orthonormal bases for the second-rank strain tensor and third-rank strain gradient tensor results in matrix representations for the modified fourth-rank and the sixth-rank tensors, such that Sylvester's formula and eigenvalue criteria can be applied to yield conditions for positive definiteness. Both criteria result in the same constraints on the constitutive parameters. A comparison with results available in the literature was possible only for the special case that the coupling term vanishes. These coincide with our results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available