4.7 Article

A stability analysis of rock slopes using a nonlinear strength reduction numerical manifold method

Journal

COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS
Volume 129, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103864

Keywords

Hoek-Brown failure criterion; Rock slope; Nonlinear strength reduction; Safety factor; Numerical manifold method (NMM)

Funding

  1. National Key RAMP
  2. D Program of China [2018YFE0100100]
  3. Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS [2020327]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51674238, 12072357, 11972043]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A nonlinear strength-reduction numerical manifold method (NSRNMM) using a generalized Hoek-Brown (GHB) criterion is proposed in this study to investigate rock slope stability. Implementing two equivalent Mohr-Coulomb (MC) criteria from the GHB criterion, the NSRNMM can accurately calculate the safety factor of rock slopes. Results show that the NSRNMM with the average equivalent MC criterion predicts a more conservative safety factor compared to the instantaneous equivalent MC criterion.
To investigate rock slope stability, a nonlinear strength-reduction numerical manifold method (NSRNMM) using a generalized Hoek-Brown (GHB) criterion is proposed. As it is difficult to implement the nonlinear strength reduction method (NSRM) with the use of the GHB criterion by directly reducing the GHB parameters, two equivalent Mohr-Coulomb (MC) criteria, namely, the instantaneous and average equivalent MC criteria that are derived from the GHB criterion, are adopted in the NSRNMM. The implementation details of the NSRNMM are discussed. The stability of two rock slopes, namely, a rock slope with a GHB material and a rock slope with a GHB material and two MC materials, is investigated using the NSRNMM. The numerical results indicate that 1) the proposed NSRNMM using the instantaneous equivalent MC criterion can accurately calculate the safety factor (F-s) of rock slopes and that 2) the F-s predicted with the NSRNMM using the average equivalent MC criterion is more conservative than that using the instantaneous equivalent MC criterion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available