4.7 Article

Characteristic analysis of humidity control in a fresh-keeping container using CFD model

Journal

COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE
Volume 179, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2020.105816

Keywords

Fresh-keeping; CFD; Humidity control; Container structure

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2020A1515010967]
  2. Research and Development Projects in Key Areas of Guangdong Province, China [2019B020225001]
  3. Guangdong Provincial Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation and Extension Project in 2019 [2019KJ101]
  4. Common Technical Innovation Team of Guangdong Province on Preservation and Logistics of Agricultural Products [2019KJ145]
  5. National Science Foundation of China [31901736, 31971806]
  6. [GZKTP201921]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Humidity control, which is affected by the performance of humidifying device and structure of the container, is very important for delaying water loss of fresh products. Humidifying rate and humidity distribution uniformity in fresh-keeping container were investigated to evaluate the characteristic of humidity control by Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) models. A pressure gauge was adopted to measure the ventilation resistance of products, by which the inertial resistance and viscous resistance values were obtained. The results of humidity performance were evaluated by entropy method. The results showed that the number of ultrasonic atomizers and sensor location had a significant effect on the humidifying rate. The effects of spray height, deflector angle and products quantity on humidifying rate are not significant, but they showed significant difference in the humidity distribution uniformity on products. The results of this study provide a better understanding of humidity control, which will help for the environment control in a fresh-keeping container.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available