4.7 Article

Mesh moving techniques in fluid-structure interaction: robustness, accumulated distortion and computational efficiency

Journal

COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS
Volume 67, Issue 2, Pages 583-600

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00466-020-01950-x

Keywords

Isogeometric analysis; Arbitrary Lagrangian– Eulerian methods; Mesh-Jacobian-based stiffening; Nonlinear elasticity; Continuation methods

Funding

  1. Projekt DEAL

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The paper discusses the importance of mesh moving techniques in fluid-structure interaction problems, comparing several commonly used techniques and proposing a novel MMT. Additionally, the performance of each MMT combined with mesh-Jacobian-based stiffening is studied, evaluating their efficiency in FSI simulations.
An important ingredient of any moving-mesh method for fluid-structure interaction (FSI) problems is the mesh moving technique (MMT) used to adapt the computational mesh in the moving fluid domain. An ideal MMT is computationally inexpensive, can handle large mesh motions without inverting mesh elements and can sustain an FSI simulation for extensive periods of time without irreversibly distorting the mesh. Here we compare several commonly used MMTs which are based on the solution of elliptic partial differential equations, including harmonic extension, bi-harmonic extension and techniques based on the equations of linear elasticity. Moreover, we propose a novel MMT which utilizes ideas from continuation methods to efficiently solve the equations of nonlinear elasticity and proves to be robust even when the mesh undergoes extreme motions. In addition to that, we study how each MMT behaves when combined with the mesh-Jacobian-based stiffening. Finally, we evaluate the performance of different MMTs on a popular two-dimensional FSI benchmark reproduced by using an isogeometric partitioned solver with strong coupling.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available