4.5 Article

Phase-field lattice Boltzmann method with two-relaxation-time model for dendrite growth of a binary alloy with melt convection

Journal

COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS SCIENCE
Volume 186, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.110070

Keywords

Phase-field method; Lattice Boltzmann method; Solidification; Convection; Dendrite

Funding

  1. KAKENHI [20H00217]
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20H00217] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By introducing the two-relaxation-time and interpolated bounce-back models, a highly efficient acceleration method for PF-LB simulations was developed in this study, which can be used for simulating the solidification of alloys.
To perform accurate, stable, and efficient phase-field lattice Boltzmann (PF-LB) simulations of the solidification of alloys with melt convection, a two-relaxation-time (TRT) model for calculating the collision term in the LB equation and an interpolated bounce-back (IBB) model for imposing a non-slip condition at a solid-liquid interface-(TRT-IBB model)-were introduced. The simulations of the plane Poiseuille flow and the dendrite growth of a binary alloy with forced convection were performed to confirm the computational accuracy and acceleration of PF-LB simulations upon introducing the TRT-IBB model. For dendrite growth with forced convection, the simulations of the TRT-IBB model were in good agreement with those of the conventional single relaxation-time (SRT) model and the dissipative drag force (DDF) model for imposing the non-slip condition at the diffuse interface (SRT-DDF model). In addition, this study confirmed that the TRT-IBB model enabled stable simulations with similar to 500-times larger time increment than the SRT-DDF model. Thus, the developed TRTIBB model was found to be extremely effective in the acceleration of PF-LB simulations for the solidification of alloys with melt convection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available