4.7 Article

Strengthening of composite T-joints using 1D and 2D carbon nanoparticles

Journal

COMPOSITE STRUCTURES
Volume 255, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112982

Keywords

Polymer matrix composites; T-joints; Carbon nanotubes and nanofibers; Graphene; Interlaminar fracture toughness

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [LP140100645]
  2. Australian Research Council [LP140100645] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents an experimental investigation on the strengthening of composite T-shaped joints using carbon nanoparticles, with carbon nanofibers showing the most effective enhancement. The research also reveals that the use of nanoparticles can improve the interlaminar fracture toughness properties of the composite materials.
An experimental study is presented into the strengthening of composite T-shaped joints using carbon nanoparticles. The structural properties of carbon fibre reinforced epoxy composite T-joints containing a small weight fraction (1%) of carbon nanotubes (CNTs), carbon nanofibers (CNFs) or graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs) within the polymer matrix phase is studied. Experimental testing reveals that the strengthening effect depends on the nanoparticle type, with CNFs being the most effective at increasing the failure initiation load (similar to 68%), ultimate failure load (46%) and absorbed energy capacity (similar to 200%) of the T-joint. Improvements to the structural properties are also gained with the use of CNTs, although there is little or no gain with GNPs. The improvements to the T-joint properties correlate with the increases to the interlaminar fracture toughness properties of the carbon fibre reinforced composite laminates containing the nanoparticles. The strengthening and toughening mechanisms induced by the nanoparticles are described.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available