4.5 Article

Management guidelines for low anterior resection syndrome - the MANUEL project

Journal

COLORECTAL DISEASE
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages 461-475

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/codi.15517

Keywords

colorectal surgery; complications; consensus; guidance; LARS; low anterior resection syndrome; rectal surgery

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article discusses the practical guidance for healthcare professionals dealing with low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) developed by the LARS Expert Advisory Panel. The guidance covers all aspects of LARS management, mostly based on expert opinions due to lack of sound evidence, providing useful directions for healthcare professionals and patients suffering from this condition.
Aim Little is known about the pathophysiology of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS), and evidence concerning the management of patients diagnosed with this condition is scarce. The aim of the LARS Expert Advisory Panel was to develop practical guidance for healthcare professionals dealing with LARS. Method The 'Management guidelines for low anterior resection syndrome' (MANUEL) project was promoted by a team of eight experts in the assessment and management of patients with LARS. After a face-to-face meeting, a strategy was agreed to create a comprehensive, practical guide covering all aspects that were felt to be clinically relevant. Eight themes were decided upon and working groups established. Each working group generated a draft; these were collated by another collaborator into a manuscript, after a conference call. This was circulated among the collaborators, and it was revised following the comments received. A lay patient revised the manuscript, and contributed to a section containing a patient's perspective. The manuscript was again circulated and finalized. A final teleconference was held at the end of the project. Results The guidance covers all aspects of LARS management, from pathophysiology, to assessment and management. Given the lack of sound evidence and the often poor quality of the studies, most of the recommendations and conclusions are based on the opinions of the experts. Conclusions The MANUEL project provides an up-to-date practical summary of the available evidence concerning LARS, with useful directions for healthcare professional and patients suffering from this debilitating condition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available