4.3 Article

Neuropsychologists' practice adjustments: the impact of COVID-19

Journal

CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages 490-517

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/13854046.2020.1863473

Keywords

teleneuropsychology; clinical practice; mental health; COVID-19

Funding

  1. National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [U54GM104942-03]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The field of neuropsychology rapidly adapted during the COVID-19 pandemic, with an increased focus on tele-neuropsychology services. Most neuropsychologists reported experiencing distress and anxiety related to the pandemic, yet this did not significantly impact their overall ability to practice. Further research is necessary to evaluate the long-term viability and sustainability of tele-neuropsychology practice.
Objective: The field of neuropsychology's response to the COVID-19 pandemic was characterized by a rapid change in clinical practice secondary to physical distancing policies and orders. The current study aimed to further characterize the change in neuropsychologists' professional practice, specifically related to teleneuropsychology (TNP) service provision, and also provide novel data regarding the impact of the pandemic on providers' emotional health. Method: This study surveyed 142 neuropsychologists between 3/30/2020 and 4/10/2020, who worked within a variety of settings (e.g., academic medical centers, general hospitals, Veterans Affairs medical centers, rehabilitation hospitals) across all four U.S. geographic regions. Mixed-model analyses of variance (ANOVAs) were conducted to assess for differences in neuropsychological practice (i.e., total number of patients and proportion of TNP seen per week) across time points (i.e., late February and early April) by practice setting and region. Descriptive statistics were conducted to describe respondents' perceptions of TNP, emotional responses to the pandemic, and perceptions of institutional/employers'/practices' responses. Results: Nearly all respondents (similar to 98%) reported making practice alterations, with similar to 73% providing at least some TNP. Neuropsychologists across all settings and regions reported performing a higher proportion of TNP evaluations by April 2020. On average, respondents reported a medium amount of distress/anxiety related to COVID-19, which had a somewhat small impact on their ability to practice overall. Conclusions: The current study further elucidated neuropsychologists' provision of TNP services and offered initial data related to their emotional response to the pandemic. Future research is needed to examine the viability and sustainability of TNP practice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available