4.7 Article

Investigating infection management and antimicrobial stewardship in surgery: a qualitative study from India and South Africa

Journal

CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION
Volume 27, Issue 10, Pages 1455-1464

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.12.013

Keywords

Antibiotic prescribing; Ethnography; Infection control; Low-and middle-income country; Surgery

Funding

  1. Economic and Social Science Research Council (ESRC)
  2. National Institute for Health Research, UK Department of Health [HPRU-2012-10047]
  3. Public Health England
  4. ESRC as part of the Antimicrobial Cross Council initiative
  5. Global Challenges Research Fund
  6. ESRC [ES/P008313/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the barriers to effective infection management and antimicrobial stewardship across high-infection-risk surgical pathways in South Africa and India. It identifies the neglect of existing roles of healthcare professionals, particularly the ownership of decisions by operating surgeons, as a critical obstacle to integrated care. The study concludes that recognizing implicit HCP roles and implementing a framework approach involving nurse leadership and pharmacist empowerment are essential for optimized care.
Objectives: To investigate the drivers for infection management and antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) across high-infection-risk surgical pathways. Methods: A qualitative studydethnographic observation of clinical practices, patient case studies, and face-to-face interviews with healthcare professionals (HCPs) and patientsdwas conducted across car-diovascular and thoracic and gastrointestinal surgical pathways in South Africa (SA) and India. Aided by Nvivo 11 software, data were coded and analysed until saturation was reached. The multiple modes of enquiry enabled cross-validation and triangulation of findings. Results: Between July 2018 and August 2019, data were gathered from 190 hours of non-participant observations (138 India, 72 SA), interviews with HCPs (44 India, 61 SA), patients (six India, eight SA), and case studies (four India, two SA). Across the surgical pathway, multiple barriers impede effective infection management and AMS. The existing implicit roles of HCPs (including nurses and senior sur-geons) are overlooked as interventions target junior doctors, bypassing the opportunity for integrating infection-related care across the surgical team. Critically, the ownership of decisions remains with the operating surgeons, and entrenched hierarchies restrict the inclusion of other HCPs in decision-making. The structural foundations to enable staff to change their behaviours and participate in infection-related surgical care are lacking. Conclusions: Identifying the implicit existing HCP roles in infection management is critical and will facilitate the development of effective and transparent processes across the surgical team for optimized care. Applying a framework approach that includes nurse leadership, empowering pharmacists and engaging surgical leads, is essential for integrated AMS and infection-related care. Sanjeev Singh, Clin Microbiol Infect 2021;27:1455 (c) 2021 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available