4.2 Review

Breast Implant-associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma

Journal

CLINICAL LYMPHOMA MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages E272-E276

Publisher

CIG MEDIA GROUP, LP
DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2020.12.005

Keywords

BIA-ALCL; Breast cancer; Lymphoproliferative disorder; Lymphoid neoplasm; T cell lymphoma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BIA-ALCL is a rare lymphoproliferative disorder associated with textured implants, with unclear pathogenesis requiring further research. Proper evaluation for diagnosis confirmation is necessary, and treatment approaches vary depending on the disease severity.
Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is an uncommon lymphoproliferative disorder, mainly associated with textured implants. The average time from the breast implants to the development of BIA-ALCL is about 7 to 10 years, and the median age at the time of diagnosis is in the mid-50s. The exact incidence and prevalence of BIA-ALCL are not known. The pathogenesis of BIA-ALCL remains unclear. Different theories have been postulated, including immune response to textured implants, subclinical bacterial infection, and genetic predisposition. However, none of those theories have yet been proven to be causal in the pathogenesis of BIA-ALCL. BIA-ALCL is histologically similar to but clinically distinct from other CD30-positive T-cell lymphomas such as anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive, anaplastic lymphoma kinase-negative, and primary cutaneous ALCL. The revised World Health Organization classification of lymphoid neoplasm in 2016 recognized BIA-ALCL as a provisional entity. Suspected cases need proper evaluation and workup to confirm the diagnosis. Surgical resection should be considered for all the cases. However, adjuvant radiotherapy and anthracycline-based chemotherapy are warranted for locally advanced and advanced cases. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available