Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) in women presenting with palpable breast findings
Vera Sorin et al.
CLINICAL IMAGING (2020)
Artefacts in contrast enhanced digital mammography: how can they affect diagnostic image quality and confuse clinical diagnosis?
Jacopo Nori et al.
INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING (2020)
The role of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in the evaluation of the postoperative breast cancer
M. H. Helal et al.
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY (2019)
Performance of Dual-Energy Contrast-enhanced Digital Mammography for Screening Women at Increased Risk of Breast Cancer
Janice S. Sung et al.
RADIOLOGY (2019)
Technique, protocols and adverse reactions for contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM): a systematic review
Moreno Zanardo et al.
INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING (2019)
The Future of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography
Matthew F. Covington et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY (2018)
Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography is Comparable to MRI in the Assessment of Residual Breast Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy
Bhavika K. Patel et al.
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY (2018)
Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography for Screening Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Xiao Zhu et al.
CLINICAL BREAST CANCER (2018)
Utility of routine use of breast ultrasound following contrast-enhanced spectral mammography
E. Klang et al.
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY (2018)
ACR BI-RADS Assessment Category 4 Subdivisions in Diagnostic Mammography: Utilization and Outcomes in the National Mammography Database
Mai Elezaby et al.
RADIOLOGY (2018)
Workflow Considerations for Incorporation of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography Into a Breast Imaging Practice
Jordana Phillips et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY (2018)
Comparative Dose of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography (CESM), Digital Mammography, and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
Jordana Phillips et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY (2018)
Contrast-Enhanced Mammography (CEM) for Detecting Residual Disease after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Comparison with Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Filipe Ramos Barra et al.
BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL (2018)
Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in comparison to conventional full-field digital mammography in a population of women with dense breasts
Miki Mori et al.
BREAST CANCER (2017)
Contamination artifact that mimics in-situ carcinoma on contrast-enhanced digital mammography
Jill Gluskin et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY (2017)
Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography as work-up tool in patients recalled from breast cancer screening has low risks and might hold clinical benefits
I. P. L. Houben et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY (2017)
Comparison of screening CEDM and MRI for women at increased risk for breast cancer: A pilot study
Maxine S. Jochelson et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY (2017)
Comparison of Background Parenchymal Enhancement at Contrast-enhanced Spectral Mammography and Breast MR Imaging
Julie Sogani et al.
RADIOLOGY (2017)
Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer: Comparison of Contrast-enhanced Spectral Mammography and Breast MR Imaging in the Evaluation of Extent of Disease
Stephanie A. Lee-Felker et al.
RADIOLOGY (2017)
Assessing tumor extent on contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus full-field digital mammography and ultrasound
Bhavika K. Patel et al.
CLINICAL IMAGING (2017)
Could parenchymal enhancement on contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) represent a new breast cancer risk factor? Correlation with known radiology risk factors
S. L. Savaridas et al.
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY (2017)
Clinical utility of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography as an adjunct for tomosynthesis-detected architectural distortion
Bhavika K. Patel et al.
CLINICAL IMAGING (2017)
Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in neoadjuvant chemotherapy monitoring: a comparison with breast magnetic resonance imaging
Valentina Iotti et al.
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH (2017)
Potential Cost Savings of Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography
Bhavika K. Patel et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY (2017)
Role of contrast enhanced spectral mammography in predicting pathological response of locally advanced breast cancer post neo-adjuvant chemotherapy
Noha Abd ElShafy ElSaid et al.
EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE (2017)
Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) versus MRI in the high-risk screening setting: patient preferences and attitudes
Jordana Phillips et al.
CLINICAL IMAGING (2017)
Breast Radiation Dose With CESM Compared With 2D FFDM and 3D Tomosynthesis Mammography
Judy R. James et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY (2017)
Contrast-enhanced Spectral Mammography: Modality-Specific Artifacts and Other Factors Which May Interfere with Image Quality
Chandni Bhimani et al.
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY (2017)
Clinical utility of dual-energy contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for breast microcalcifications without associated mass: a preliminary analysis
Yun-Chung Cheung et al.
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY (2016)
Adding the power of iodinated contrast media to the credibility of mammography in breast cancer diagnosis
Alexandra Tsigginou et al.
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY (2016)
Can we apply the MRI BI-RADS lexicon morphology descriptors on contrast-enhanced spectral mammography?
Rasha M. Kamal et al.
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY (2016)
Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography improves diagnostic accuracy in the symptomatic setting
S. L. Tennant et al.
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY (2016)
Challenges in contrast-enhanced spectral mammography interpretation: artefacts lexicon
Y. Yagil et al.
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY (2016)
Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in recalls from the Dutch breast cancer screening program: validation of results in a large multireader, multicase study
U. C. Lalji et al.
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY (2016)
Degree of Enhancement on Contrast Enhanced Spectral Mammography (CESM) and Lesion Type on Mammography (MG): Comparison Based on Histological Results
Elzbieta Luczynska et al.
MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR (2016)
Agreement between MRI and pathologic breast tumor size after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and comparison with alternative tests: individual patient data meta-analysis
Michael L. Marinovich et al.
BMC CANCER (2015)
Clinical evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography and contrast enhanced tomosynthesis-Comparison to contrast-enhanced breast MRI
Chen-Pin Chou et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY (2015)
Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) and contrast enhanced MRI (CEMRI): Patient preferences and tolerance
Max M. Hobbs et al.
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY (2015)
Gadolinium Deposition after Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging
Tomonori Kanda et al.
RADIOLOGY (2015)
The Quality of Tumor Size Assessment by Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography and the Benefit of Additional Breast MRI
Marc B. I. Lobbes et al.
JOURNAL OF CANCER (2015)
Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: Does mammography provide additional clinical benefits or can some radiation exposure be avoided?
Eva Maria Fallenberg et al.
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT (2014)
Low energy mammogram obtained in contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) is comparable to routine full-field digital mammography (FFDM)
Mark A. Francescone et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY (2014)
Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus MRI: Initial results in the detection of breast cancer and assessment of tumour size
E. M. Fallenberg et al.
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY (2014)
Diagnostic performance of dual-energy contrast-enhanced subtracted mammography in dense breasts compared to mammography alone: interobserver blind-reading analysis
Yun-Chung Cheung et al.
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY (2014)
Radiation Exposure of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography Compared With Full-Field Digital Mammography
Cecile R. L. P. N. Jeukens et al.
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY (2014)
Prevalence of Mammographically Dense Breasts in the United States
Brian L. Sprague et al.
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE (2014)
Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography: Comparison with Conventional Mammography and Histopathology in 152 Women
Elzbieta Luczynska et al.
KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY (2014)
Bilateral Contrast-enhanced Dual-Energy Digital Mammography: Feasibility and Comparison with Conventional Digital Mammography and MR Imaging in Women with Known Breast Carcinoma
Maxine S. Jochelson et al.
RADIOLOGY (2013)
Evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography
Felix Diekmann et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY (2011)
Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results
Clarisse Dromain et al.
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY (2011)
Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study to Refine Management Recommendations for Women at Elevated Familial Risk of Breast Cancer: The EVA Trial
Christiane Kuhl et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY (2010)
Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS)
MO Leach et al.
LANCET (2005)
Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital subtraction mammography: Feasibility
JM Lewin et al.
RADIOLOGY (2003)
Contrast-enhanced digital mammography: Initial clinical experience
RA Jong et al.
RADIOLOGY (2003)
Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography (vol 138, pg 168, 2003)
PA Carney et al.
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE (2003)
Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography
PA Carney et al.
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE (2003)
Accuracy of MRI in the detection of residual breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
EL Rosen et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY (2003)
Breast MR imaging screening in 192 women proved or suspected to be carriers of a breast cancer susceptibility gene: Preliminary results
CK Kuhl et al.
RADIOLOGY (2000)
Share Paper
