4.5 Article

Exploring a New Systematic Route for Left Ventricular Pacing in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Journal

CIRCULATION JOURNAL
Volume 85, Issue 3, Pages 283-+

Publisher

JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOC
DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-20-0266

Keywords

Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Coronary sinus angiogram; Left ventricular lead; Multisite pacing; Venous collateral

Funding

  1. MicroPort CRM
  2. European Union [737817, 675353]
  3. H2020 Societal Challenges Programme [737817] Funding Source: H2020 Societal Challenges Programme

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Analysis of venograms in CRT patients revealed the presence of venous collaterals between LV veins, facilitating the potential for accessing multiple LV sites with a single LV microlead implantation.
Background: Frequency and distribution of left ventricular (LV) venous collaterals were studied in vivo to evaluate the ease and feasibility of implanting a new ultra-thin LV quadripolar microlead for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Methods and Results: Evaluable venograms were analyzed to define the prevalence of venous collaterals (>0.5 mm diameter) between: (1) different LV segments; and (2) different major LV veins in: unselected patients who underwent CRT from 2008 to 2012 at Rouen Hospital, France (retrospective); and CRT patients from the Axone Acute pilot study in 2018 (prospective). In prospective patients with evaluable venograms, LV microlead implantation was attempted. Thirty-six (21/65 retrospective, 15/20 prospective) patients had evaluable venograms with >= 1 visible venous collaterals. Collaterals were found between LV veins in all CRT patients with evaluable venograms. Regionally, prevalence was highest between: the apical inferior and apical lateral (42%); and mid inferior and mid inferolateral (42%) segments. Collateral connections were most prevalent between: the inferior interventricular vein (IIV) and lateral vein (64% [23/36]); and IIV and infero-lateral vein (36% [13/36]). Cross-vein microlead implantation was possible in 18 patients (90%), and single-vein implantation was conducted in the other 2 patients (10%). Conclusions: Venous collaterals were found in vivo between LV veins in all CRT patients with evaluable venograms, making this network an option for accessing multiple LV sites using a single LV microlead.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available