4.2 Review

Mitotic checkpoint defects: en route to cancer and drug resistance

Journal

CHROMOSOME RESEARCH
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages 131-144

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10577-020-09646-x

Keywords

Mitotic checkpoint; Spindle assembly checkpoint; Microtubule targeting agents; Carcinogenesis; Drug resistance

Funding

  1. Department of Health Research, Govt. of India [R.12014/12/2018-HR]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Loss of mitosis regulation in malignant cells can lead to inaccurate chromosome segregation and facilitate cancer development. Defects in the mitotic checkpoint may also contribute to drug resistance in cancer treatment. Mitotic slippage and senescence are important factors in drug resistance scenarios.
Loss of mitosis regulation is a common feature of malignant cells that leads to aberrant cell division with inaccurate chromosome segregation. The mitotic checkpoint is responsible for faithful transmission of genetic material to the progeny. Defects in this checkpoint, such as mutations and changes in gene expression, lead to abnormal chromosome content or aneuploidy that may facilitate cancer development. Furthermore, a defective checkpoint response is indicated in the development of drug resistance to microtubule poisons that are used in treatment of various blood and solid cancers for several decades. Mitotic slippage and senescence are important cell fates that occur even with an active mitotic checkpoint and are held responsible for the resistance. However, contradictory findings in both the scenarios of carcinogenesis and drug resistance have aroused questions on whether mitotic checkpoint defects are truly responsible for these dismal outcomes. Here, we discuss the possible contribution of the faulty checkpoint signaling in cancer development and drug resistance, followed by the latest research on this pathway for better outcomes in cancer treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available