4.7 Article

The impact of pyrolysis temperature on physicochemical properties and pulmonary toxicity of tobacco stem micro-biochar

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 263, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128349

Keywords

Micro-biochars; ROS; Oxidative DNA damage; Epithelial barrier; Pyrolysis temperature

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST, Taiwan) [106-2314-B-150-001, 107-2221-E-150-004-MY3, 108-2622-E-150-006-CC3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biochars (BCs) produced at different pyrolysis temperatures have varying impacts on pulmonary toxicity in human lung cells, with higher temperature BCs potentially causing greater cytotoxicity and genotoxicity.
Biochars (BCs) are currently widely used, yet their impact on human health is mostly unknown. We generated micro-tobacco stem-pyrolysed BCs (mTBCs) at different pyrolysis temperatures and assessed pulmonary toxicity in normal human lung epithelial BEAS-2B cells. mTBCs generated at 350 degrees C (mTBC350) and 650 degrees C (mTBC650) were analysed and compared for physicochemical properties and adverse effects. Pyrolysis temperature had a significant influence on chemical composition, particle size, specific surface area and aromatic carbon structure. mTBC650 displayed a highly ordered aromatic carbon structure with smaller particle size, high surface area (20.09 m2/g) and high polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon and metal content. This composition could promote reactive oxygen species accumulation accompanied by greater cytotoxicity, genotoxicity and epithelial barrier malfunction in cultured cells. Thus, the risk of pulmonary toxicity owing to micro-BCs (mBCs) is affected by pyrolysis temperature. Long-term exposure to mBCs produced at high temperatures may lead to or exacerbate pulmonary disease. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available