4.7 Article

Concentration polarization effect and preferable membrane configuration at pressure-retarded osmosis operation

Journal

DESALINATION
Volume 389, Issue -, Pages 58-67

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2016.02.028

Keywords

Forward osmosis; Pressure-retarded osmosis; Concentrative external concentration; polarization; Power generation; Desalination

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) Grant - Korean Government (MSIP) [NRF-2015R1A5A7037825]
  2. Center for Eco-Smart Water Works System, Eco-Smart Water System Development Project of the Ministry of Environment [2014001080001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effect of concentration polarization on performances of integrally asymmetric and thin film composite forward osmosis (FO) membranes was systematically investigated in two membrane configurations - active layer facing feed solution (AL-FS) and active layer facing draw solution (AL-DS). Water fluxes of the membranes using pure water as FS in AL-DS were 1.7 to 2.6 times higher than those in AL-FS. However, with increasing FS concentration, the water flux in AL-DS declined rapidly and became lower than that in AL-FS. A modeling study showed that the reversal of water flux in the two configurations were resulted from concentrative ECP, and theoretical FS concentrations at which water fluxes in both configurations were equal were inversely proportional to the initial water flux of the membranes. The turnover of the water flux in AL-DS and AL-FS was also observed within 8 h when seawater and river water were used as DS and FS, respectively. Moreover, the AL-DS faced the challenge of high fouling propensity and difficulty in cleaning more than the AL-FS. This study suggests that AL-FS membrane configuration is proper for both PRO and FO processes employing real natural water in terms of high membrane performance and ease of cleaning. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available