4.6 Article

Neutral Chiral Tetrakis-Iodo-Triazole Halogen-Bond Donor for Chiral Recognition and Enantioselective Catalysis

Journal

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages 2315-2320

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.202005016

Keywords

chiral anion recognition; DFT; halogen bonding; NMR titration; organocatalysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study introduced a novel chiral tetrakis-iodo-triazole structure as a neutral halogen bond donor for chiral anion-recognition and enantioinduction in ion-pair organocatalysis. It demonstrated selective recognition of chiral dicarboxylates and asymmetric induction in a benchmark organocatalytic reaction using the halogen bond donor, with inversions in chiral recognition, enantioselectivity, and chiroptical properties relative to the related hydrogen donor.
Halogen bonding represents a powerful tool in the field of noncovalent interactions. However, applications in enantioselective recognition and catalysis remain almost nonexistent, due in part to the distinct features of halogen bonds, including long covalent and noncovalent bond distances and high directionality. Herein, this work presents a novel chiral tetrakis-iodo-triazole structure as a neutral halogen bond donor for both chiral anion-recognition and enantioinduction in ion-pair organocatalysis. NMR-titration studies revealed significant differences in anion affinity between the halogen bonding receptor and its hydrogen bonding parent. Selective recognition of chiral dicarboxylates and asymmetric induction in a benchmark organocatalytic reaction were demonstrated using the halogen bond donor. Inversions in the absolute sense of chiral recognition, enantioselectivity, and chiroptical properties relative to the related hydrogen donor were observed. Computational modeling suggested that these effects were the result of distinct anion-binding modes for the halogen- versus hydrogen-bond donors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available