4.6 Article

Calix[4]pyrrolato Aluminates: The Effect of Ligand Modification on the Reactivity of Square-Planar Aluminum Anions

Journal

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
Volume 27, Issue 16, Pages 5120-5124

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.202005493

Keywords

aluminum; anti-van  ’ t Hoff– Le Bel; calix[4]pyrrole; Lewis acid; planar aluminate

Funding

  1. DFG (Emmy-Noether program) [GR 5007/2-1]
  2. Foundation of German Business (sdw)
  3. DFG
  4. Projekt DEAL

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigated the properties of square-planar aluminum anions and the impact of ligand modification through a systematic screening process. The results revealed that different ligand structures can lead to opposing trends in the coordination preferences of aluminum anions, potentially allowing for mode-selective binding in catalytic reactions for control of reaction rates.
Structural constraint represents an attractive tool to modify p-block element properties without the need for unusual oxidation or valence states. The recently reported methyl-calix[4]pyrrolato aluminate established the effect of forcing a tetrahedral aluminum anion into a square-planar coordination mode. However, the generality of this structural motif and any consequence of ligand modification remained open. Herein, a systematic ligand screening was launched, and the class of square-planar aluminum anions was extended by two derivatives that differ in the meso-substitution at the calix[4]pyrrolato ligand. Strikingly, this modification provoked opposing trends in the preference for a Lewis acidic binding mode with sigma-donors versus the aluminum-ligand cooperative binding mode with carbonyls. Insights into the origin of these counterintuitive experimental observations were provided by computation and bond analysis. Importantly, this rationale might allow to exploit mode-selective binding for catalytic rate control.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available