4.7 Article

Analysis of a solar desalinator (humidification-dehumidification cycle) including a compound system consisting of a solar humidifier and subsurface condenser using DoE

Journal

DESALINATION
Volume 397, Issue -, Pages 9-21

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2016.06.010

Keywords

Humidification-dehumidification cycle (HD); Subsurface drip irrigation; Condensation irrigation; Design of experiments (DoE); Solar humidifier; Underground condenser

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, a solar desalination system with humidification-dehumidification cycle consisting of a solar humidifier and a subsurface condensation mechanism designed for producing fresh or irrigation water is studied and numerically simulated. In this system, solar energy is used for providing the required heat and a set of tubes buried in the soil are used as condensers. Initially, in order to increase inflowing air humidity, seawater or any other brackish water is vaporized in a solar humidifier and then the humid air is passed through a set of tubes buried in the soil. Then the condensation mechanism takes place and fresh water is produced. Mass and energy balance equations for solar humidifier and subsurface condenser are used for thermodynamic analysis. The resulting linear and nonlinear equations are numerically solved for analyzing different parameters of the cycle and determining the amount of water produced. Finally, the sensitivity of the cycle's primary parameters was analyzed using design of experiment (DoE) method based on response surface method (RSM) in order to obtain optimal conditions. In addition different diagrams are presented to assist the designer to choose suitable design parameters based on the operational conditions. According to the design and numerical simulation, the rate of fresh water produced per underground pipe's length is 3.812153(kg/m.hr). (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available