4.8 Review

Computational Methods in Heterogeneous Catalysis

Journal

CHEMICAL REVIEWS
Volume 121, Issue 2, Pages 1007-1048

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01060

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Catalysis Science Program [DE-FG02-05ER15731]
  2. Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore
  3. DOE [DE-AC02-05CH11231]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Computational heterogeneous catalysis shows great promise for designing and discovering novel catalysts, with recent advances in electronic structure methods, atomistic catalyst models, and microkinetic modeling bridging the gap between nanoscale insights and macroscale experimental data. Remaining challenges include improving model accuracy and addressing discrepancies between experimental and computational results.
The unprecedented ability of computations to probe atomic-level details of catalytic systems holds immense promise for the fundamentals-based bottom-up design of novel heterogeneous catalysts, which are at the heart of the chemical and energy sectors of industry. Here, we critically analyze recent advances in computational heterogeneous catalysis. First, we will survey the progress in electronic structure methods and atomistic catalyst models employed, which have enabled the catalysis community to build increasingly intricate, realistic, and accurate models of the active sites of supported transition-metal catalysts. We then review developments in microkinetic modeling, specifically mean-field microkinetic models and kinetic Monte Carlo simulations, which bridge the gap between nanoscale computational insights and macroscale experimental kinetics data with increasing fidelity. We finally review the advancements in theoretical methods for accelerating catalyst design and discovery. Throughout the review, we provide ample examples of applications, discuss remaining challenges, and provide our outlook for the near future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available