4.6 Article

Theoretical and experimental limits of monodisperse droplet generation

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
Volume 229, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2020.116093

Keywords

Microfluidics; Microdroplets; Monodispersity; Numerical modeling; T-junction; Two phase flow

Funding

  1. TUBITAK [215E086]
  2. Science Academy, Turkey through the Young Scientist Award Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study introduces an analytical method to optimize the monodispersity of droplet generation systems, modeling the system dynamics using electron flow analogy and providing unique solutions and design guidelines. Experimental results verify the effectiveness of this analytical approach and reveal the limiting experimental factors for achieving the theoretical maximum monodispersity.
Droplet microfluidic systems are becoming routine in advanced biochemical studies such as single cell gene expression, immuno profiling, precise nucleic acid quantification (dPCR) and particle synthesis. For all these applications, ensuring droplet monodispersity is critical to minimize the uncertainty due to droplet volume variation. Despite the wide usage of droplet-based microfluidic systems, the limit of monodispersity for droplet generation systems is still unknown. Here, we present an analytical approach that takes into account all the system dynamics and internal/external factors that disturb monodisper-sity. Interestingly, we are able to model the dynamics of a segmented two-phase flow system using a single-phase flow analogy, electron flow, in electrical circuits. We offer a unique solution and design guidelines to ensure ultra-monodisperse droplet generation. Our analytical conclusions are experimentally verified using a T-junction droplet generator. Equally importantly, we show the limiting experimental factors for reaching the theoretical maximum of monodispersity. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available